• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Savoir Credit Corp

  • Legal Concerns of Sports Organizations
    • Harassment in Sports
    • Task of Care in Sports
    • Contracts in Sports Organization
  • Labor Issues in Sports
    • Antitrust Issues
    • Tort Law Concerns in Sports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Legal Cases

October 17, 2019 By James

Theory Of Corporate Personality | Company Law | Cases Saloman V. Saloman | Lee V. Lee

Theory Of Corporate Personality | Company Law | Cases Saloman V. Saloman | Lee V. Lee


Corporate personality is the creation of law. And as per the law, a corporation is an artificial person created by the personification of a group of individuals. The theory of corporate personality mainly states that a company has a legal identity different from its member. Both English and Indian laws follow the concept of corporate personality.

For the first time, this concept was recognized in the year 1867 in the case of Oakes v. Turquand and Harding. But it was approved and firmly established in the leading case of Salomon vs. Salomon in which it was held that a company has its own personality which is different from the personalities of the individuals.

I. CASE STUDY: Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd:
Issue: Was the formation of Salomon’s company a fraud intended to defraud the creditors?
In this case, it established the concept of separate legal personality of a company that allowed shareholders to carry on trading with minimal exposure to the risk of personal insolvency in the event of a collapse.
Held: The court said that on incorporation, the company became an independent legal person and not an agent of Salomon. Salomon, as a debenture holder of the company, was ought to get priority in payment over the unsecured creditor.

II. CASE STUDY: Lee v. Lee’s Air Farming Ltd.
Issue: Was there a separate legal entity? Whether Mrs. Lee can claim compensation?
Held: Judicial Committee of the Privy Council also said that a company is a separate legal entity so that a director could still be under a contract of employment with the company he solely owned.

——————
Certificate Course on Company Law:

——————
Read More on the Blog:

—————–
Instagram Id: finologylegal

Filed Under: Legal Cases

October 15, 2019 By James

Top 10 Most Famous Legal Battles In Music

Top 10 Most Famous Legal Battles In Music


Want more incredible content from Getty Images? Be sure to check out their Instagram page here:

To learn more about SoundMojo or to submit your music, click here:

These cases pitted the music industry’s greats against each other! Welcome to WatchMojo and today we’ll be taking a look at our picks for the Top 10 Infamous Legal Battles in Music.
For this list, we’ll be breaking down the biggest legal cases surrounding music publishing rights, sampling, stolen material and more. From Metallica and Napster, The Rolling Stones and The Verve,
Eazy E Vs Dr. Dre and Marvin Gaye and Robin Thicke, these legal decisions set important precedents for the industry as a whole. Are there any legal battles we’re missing? Let us know in the comments below!

#10: Ray Parker Jr. Vs. Huey Lewis
#9: Eazy-E Vs. Death Row Records/Dr. Dre
#8: David Bowie/Queen Vs. Vanilla Ice
#7: Roger Waters Vs. Pink Floyd
#6: Rolling Stones Vs. The Verve
#5: Paul McCartney Vs. Michael Jackson/Sony/ATV Music Publishing
#4: Marvin Gaye Vs. Robin Thicke/Pharrell Williams
#3, #2 & #1: ?

Check out more awesome content right here:

Top 10 Court Cases that Changed America:

Top 10 SHOCKING Music Scandals

Top 10 Onstage Freakouts By Musicians

Check out the voting page for this list and add your picks

#Napster #Kesha #Metallica #BlurredLines

Check our our other channels!

WatchMojo’s Social Media Pages

Get WatchMojo merchandise at shop.watchmojo.com

WatchMojo’s ten thousand videos on Top 10 lists, Origins, Biographies, Tips, How To’s, Reviews, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.

Filed Under: Legal Cases

October 14, 2019 By James

How A Case Gets To The US Supreme Court

How A Case Gets To The US Supreme Court


The only way is by surviving “the rule of four”.

Subscribe to our channel!

Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what’s really driving the events in the headlines. Check out to get up to speed on everything from Kurdistan to the Kim Kardashian app.

Most often, the US Supreme Court grants or denies petitions to hear a case after reviewing a written request called a “petition for writ of certiorari”. Also called “the writ of cert”, it is reviewed by the Justices and granting the petition depends on whether or not it passes “the rule of four”. If it does, the case is probably one of three types: a case of national importance, a case in which a lower court decision has invalidated federal law, or a case involving a split decision in lower courts. Famously, Bush v. Gore was an example of national importance, Gonzales v. Raich was a case in which a lower court invalidated federal law, and Obergefell v. Hodges was selected by the Court in order to resolve a circuit split decision. By following this protocol of case selection, the Court has been designed to be reactive to legislative decisions made in other branches of government, as opposed to an active legislative body that seeks to create and institute new laws. Overall, the result of this design is a Court that prioritizes case selections that will enable them to enforce the uniformity of federal law throughout the country.

Check out our full video catalog:
Follow Vox on Twitter:
Or on Facebook:

Filed Under: Legal Cases

October 12, 2019 By James

IPC Section 323 In Telugu | High Court Advocate Sai Krishna Azad | Law Media

IPC Section 323 In Telugu | High Court Advocate Sai Krishna Azad | Law Media


#IPCsection323 in #Telugu, is that your query?

Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt.—Whoever, except in the case provided for by section.

—————-
———————————————————————————————————–
Sai Krishna Azad High Court Advocate In Hyderabad
Office: 1-8-702/19/A3, opp: Nandini Hotel, Near Shankarmutt, Nallakunta,, Hyderabad, Telangana 500044
Mail:azadforu12@gmail.com, lawforu12@gmail.com
————————————————————————————-
Our Websites

Youtube Channel:

Filed Under: Legal Cases

October 10, 2019 By James

Case Study 6 (Company Law Case Studies Video)

Case Study 6 (Company Law Case Studies Video)


TO WATCH FULL COURSE VIDEOS, DOWNLOAD MY MOBILE APPLICATION || CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK

Company Law case studies by Sudhir Sachdeva

Filed Under: Legal Cases

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Get new posts by email

Sponsor

Pages

  • Labor Issues in Sports
    • Antitrust Issues
    • Tort Law Concerns in Sports
  • Legal Concerns of Sports Organizations
    • Contracts in Sports Organization
    • Harassment in Sports
    • Task of Care in Sports
  • Sports Law and Legal Issues

Recent Posts

  • Theory Of Corporate Personality | Company Law | Cases Saloman V. Saloman | Lee V. Lee

    Theory Of Corporate Personality | Company Law | Cases Saloman V. Saloman | Lee V. Lee

    October 17, 2019
  • Senate Legal Committee Studies Deferred Prosecution Agreements – Questions To Min Qualtrough

    Senate Legal Committee Studies Deferred Prosecution Agreements – Questions To Min Qualtrough

    October 16, 2019
  • Top 10 Most Famous Legal Battles In Music

    Top 10 Most Famous Legal Battles In Music

    October 15, 2019
  • The Legal Challenges Of The COP21 Agreement

    The Legal Challenges Of The COP21 Agreement

    October 14, 2019
  • How A Case Gets To The US Supreme Court

    How A Case Gets To The US Supreme Court

    October 14, 2019

Follow Us

Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Tweet
YouTube
Pinterest
Instagram
Copyright © 2021 · Savoir Credit Corp | All rights reserved.